Rules about dispute resolution

The Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (CATSI Act) requires the constitution or rule book of an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander corporation to include a process for dealing with disputes within the corporation (s. 66-1(3A)).

Example dispute resolution processes

ORIC’s rule book condensed provides an example dispute resolution process, see also this policy paper. Research conducted by AIATSIS found that whilst a number of PBCs used this dispute resolution process as a guide, only a minority used this dispute resolution process without any changes or additions.

Condensed rule book dispute resolution process

  • If a dispute arises, the parties must first try to resolve it themselves.
  • If the dispute is not resolved within 10 business days, any party may give a dispute notice to the other parties. The dispute notice must be in writing and must say what the dispute is about. It must be given to the corporation.
  • The directors must help the parties resolve the dispute within 20 business days after the corporation receives the notice.
  • If the directors cannot resolve the dispute, it must be put to the members to resolve it at a general meeting.

Seeking assistance from the Registrar

  • If a dispute or any part of a dispute relates to the meaning of any provision of the CATSI Act or the corporation’s rule book, the directors or any party to the dispute may seek an opinion from the Registrar about the correct meaning of the relevant provision.
  • The Registrar’s opinion will not be binding on the parties to a dispute.

The right to request assistance from the Registrar does not create a right to request a formal mediation. However, in an appropriate case the Registrar may provide assistance in having the matter resolved. For more information on members’ rights see rule 3.3.

Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation (YMAC) has produced a guide on how to handle complaints and disputes.

What changes or additions do PBCs make to the dispute resolution process?

PBCs have made the following changes in regards to the dispute resolution process in their rule books:

  • changing the amount of time allowed for each stage of the dispute resolution process;
  • including the use of independent mediation and/or arbitration;
  • using their NTRB to help resolve disputes;
  • using Elders Councils and/or other traditional advisory groups to help resolve disputes; and/or
  • stating that disputes must be resolved ‘in accordance with Traditional Law and Custom’.

Disputes over membership

Some PBC constitutions include a section dealing specifically with disputes over membership. These processes include referring the dispute to an elders council, a subcommittee or an Native Title Service Provider (NTSP) and/or bringing the dispute to the next General Meeting for the members to decide on a resolution.

Examples from PBC rule books

  • The Githabul Nation rule book includes a process where the PBC goes to NTSCorp, their NTRB, or another independent person to help them arbitrate disputes about membership.
  • Top End PBC similarly utilises the Northern Land Council (NLC) to help review their decisions about membership. If the NLC determines that a person is eligible for membership the PBC must approve the membership and in the opposite case the PBC must cancel the membership.
  • Gawler Ranges have established a review panel to deal with disputes over membership.
  • Ilkewartn Ywel and Mer Gedkem Le PBCs both draw upon traditional decision making processes to deal with membership disputes. Ilkewartn Ywel refers unresolved membership applications to the senior apmerek-artwey and kwertengerl who then put their resolution on the application to the directors to vote.
  • Mer Gedkem Le similarly use the Meriam Tribal Council to assist in making decisions about membership application.  

Some PBC rule books refer membership disputes to a general meeting and outline that an individual involved in a membership dispute has the right to appeal the decision and make their case for membership at a general meeting. The members then have the responsibility to determine or not the applicant is eligible for member. The right of the applicant to address a general meeting is not included within the CATSI Act model. 

The current CATSI Act review will likely impact on membership management, see also rules about members.

Further resources